Volume- 2
Issue- 6
Year- 2014
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Chaitali J. Pawar , Dhanashree V. Patil
The rapid expansion in web environment and advancement in technology have led us to access and manage enormous images easily in various fields. Present internet image search engines purely faith on keyword based information over images. Keywords provided by user cannot determine content of images correctly. Resultant images comprised of several disordered and uncertain images. To clarify this doubtfulness in keyword-based image search, it is valuable to use visual details of image. System has been designed to overthrown unpredictability of images such that users aim can be determined by one click internet Image search. User preferred a query image in set of images returned by expanded keyword-based search. This technique provides extra clusters generated by applying combination of candidate words and visual features of images by Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) algorithm. Weight of image is calculated by providing procedure of weight adaption. Results are refined by re-arranging of images by homogeneity calculation. Message Digest (MD5) hash function is used for detecting and removing duplicate images. Resolution of images is considered for further enhancing quality of images. Intention of user is estimated by combining textual and visual resemblance without utilizing extra efforts. An experimental observation determines expressive enrichment in concern with user justice and significancy.
[1]F. Jing, C. Wang, Y. Yao, K. Deng, L. Zhang, and W. Ma, “Igroup: Web Image Search Results Clustering,” Proc. 14th Ann. ACM Int’l Conf. Multimedia, 2006.
[2] Xiaoou Tang, Ke Liu, Jingyu Cui, Fang Wen and Xiaogang Wang, “IntentSearch : Capturing User Intention for One-Click Internet Image Search”, IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 34, no. 7,july 2012.
[3] J. Cui, F. Wen, and X. Tang, “Real Time Google and Live Image Search Re-Ranking,” Proc. 16th ACM Int’l Conf,Multimedia, 2008.
[4] J. Cui, F. Wen, and X. Tang, “IntentSearch: Interactive On-Line Image Search Re-Ranking,” Proc. 16th ACM Int’l Conf.Multimedia,2008.
[5] N. Ben-Haim, B. Babenko, and S. Belongie, “Improving Web Based Image Search via Content Based Clustering,” Proc. Int’l Workshop Semantic Learning Applications in Multimedia 2006.
[6] R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman, “A Visual Categor Filter for Google Images,” Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision,2004.
[7] Y. Jing and S. Baluja, “Pagerank for Product Image Search,” Proc. Int’l Conf. World Wide Web, 2008.
[8] W.H. Hsu, L.S. Kennedy, and S.-F. Chang, “Video Search Re-ranking via Information Bottleneck Principle,” Proc. 14th Ann.ACM Int’l Conf. Multimedia, 2006.
[9] C. Wang, F. Jing, L. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “Scalable Search Based Image Annotation of Personal Images,” Proc. Eighth ACM Int’l Workshop Multimedia Information Retrieval, 2006.
[10] J. Deng, A.C. Berg, and L. Fei-Fei, “Hierarchical Semantic Indexing for Large Scale Image Retrieval,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011.
[11] R. Yan, E. Hauptmann, and R. Jin, “Multimedia Search with Pseudo-Relevance Feedback,” Proc. Int’l Conf. Image and Video Retrieval, 2003.
[12] R. Yan, A.G. Hauptmann, and R. Jin, “Negative Pseudo- Relevance Feedback in Content-Based Video Retrieval,” Proc.11th ACM Int’l Conf. Multimedia, 2003.
[13] B. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “A World Wide Web Based Image Search Engine Using Text and Image Content Features,” Proc. IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, Internet Imaging IV, 2003.
[14] A. Frome, Y. Singer, F. Sha, and J. Malik, “Learning GloballyConsistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision, 2007.
[15] Y. Lin, T. Liu, and C. Fuh, “Local Ensemble Kernel Learning For Object Category Recognition,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.
[16] D. Lowe, “Distinctive Image Features from Scale Invariant Keypoints, ” Int’l J. Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91-110, 2004.
[17] R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, “Modern Information Retrieval”, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., 1999
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Rajaramnagar 415414, India
No. of Downloads: 2 | No. of Views: 1859
Deepa Ajish.
March 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 2
Sakshi Srivastava, Ruchi Pandey, Shuvam Kumar Gupta, Saurabh Nayak.
November 2023 - Vol 11, Issue 6
Mallisetty Siva Mahesh, Kattamuri B N Ayyappa, Maddela Murali, Mididoddi Surendra Babu, Nagababu Pachhala.
November 2023 - Vol 11, Issue 6