To see whether the related mistake patterns can be linked to a particular set of variables, a Eight Control equipment recognizing (and six forced-alignment) algorithms were evaluated for clinical diagnosis. Each recognizing service's result was converted to a standardized way and evaluated to a comparative record made from pronunciations labelled data (which included 54 minutes of information from several hundred speakers). A job evaluation was used to relate a combination of acoustic, morphological, etc. speaker attributes to acknowledgment occurrences throughout this reference data. The decision trees show that correct categorization of phonetic segments and characteristics is one of the most constant variables linked with better recognition performance. These findings indicate that enhancing the pronouncing modelling used in verbal pairing, including the acoustic modeling techniques utilized for morphological classification, might improve future-generation recognition systems.