Volume- 10
Issue- 3
Year- 2022
DOI: 10.55524/ijircst.2022.10.3.18 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2022.10.3.18
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Aayat Aijaz , Anuj Sachar
The previous few decades have seen exceptional advances in the utilization of composite materials in structural applications. Structural members that are comprised of at least two distinct materials are known as composite elements. The principle advantage of composite elements is that the properties of every material can be joined to frame a solitary unit that performs preferable generally speaking over its different constituent parts. Composite columns are a blend of two customary underlying structures: primary steel and primary cement. As composite columns were by and large created after steel columns and supported concrete columns, their plan approach might have been founded on one or the other steel or substantial plan techniques. In this thesis G+10, G15, G+30 storey conventional building models are been compared with composite column and compared their behaviour under zone III seismic condition using etabs. Change in the shape and size of composite column gives better result.
M. Tech Student, RIMT University, Mandi, Gobindgarh, Punjab, India
No. of Downloads: 23 | No. of Views: 645
Bilal Alhammud, Dr. Ayse Yeter Günal, Rajab Alkhatib.
May 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 3
Aaqib Bashir, Brahmjeet Singh.
January 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 1
Samsul Abdul Rahman Sidik Hasibuan.
January 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 1