Volume- 2
Issue- 4
Year- 2014
Mr.Nitinkumar M. Pachkawade , Mr.ManojM.Dongre
In this paper, we introduced concept of unique word orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (UW-OFDM). In UW-OFDM instead of conventional cyclic prefixes (CPs) we use deterministic sequence, which we called unique word (UW’s), as a guard interval. Since Unique word represent known sequence they are advantageously be used for synchronization and channel estimation purposes. The UW’s are generated by approximately loding so called redundant subcarrier. We derived optimum complex valued code generator matrices matched to best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) and to linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) data estimator. With the help of simulations we highlight the superior bit error ratio (BER) performance of non-systematic coded UW-OFDM compared to systematic coded UW-OFDM and to CP-OFDM in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) as well as in frequency selective environments.
[1] R. van Nee, R. Prasad, OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications, Artech House Publishers, Boston, 2000.
[2] H. Witschnig, T. Mayer, A. Springer, A. Koppler, L. Maurer, M. Huemer, R. Weigel, ”A Different Look on Cyclic Prefix for SC/FDE” In the Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC 2002), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 824-828, September 2002.
[3] M. Huemer, C. Hofbauer, J.B. Huber, “The Potential of Unique Words in OFDM”, In the Proceedings of the 15th International OFDMWorkshop (InOWo’ 10), Hamburg, Germany, pp. 140 -144, September 2010.
[4] A. Onic and M. Huemer, “Direct versus two-step approach for unique word generation in UW-OFDM,” in Proc. 15th Int. OFDM Workshop, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 2010, pp. 145–149. .
[5] C. Hofbauer, M. Huemer, and J. B. Huber, “Coded OFDM by unique word prefix,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Syst. (IEEE ICCS), Singapore, Nov. 2010, 5 pp.
[6] M. Huemer, A. Onic, and C. Hofbauer, “Classical and Bayesian linear data estimators for unique word OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 6073–6085, Dec. 2011.
[7] A. Czylwik, “Comparison between adaptive OFDM and single carrier modulation with frequency domain equalization,” in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC), Phoenix, AZ, May 1997, pp. 865–869.
[8] L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, “Training sequence versus Cyclic prefix: A new look on single carrier communication,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Global Commun. (IEEE GLOBECOM), Nov. 2000, pp. 1056–1060.
[9] R. Cendrillon and M. Moonen, “Efficient equalizers for single and multi-carrier environments with known symbol padding,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp Signal Process Its Appl. (ISSPA), Aug. 2001, pp. 607–610
[10] M. Huemer, C. Hofbauer, and J. B. Huber, “Unique word prefix in SC/FDE and OFDM: A comparison,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM Workshop Broadband Single Carrier Freq. Domain Commun. (BSCFDC), Miami, FL, Dec. 2010, pp. 1321–1326.
[11] M. Muck, M. de Courville, and P. Duhamel, “A pseudorandom postfix OFDM modulator—Semi-blind channel estimation and equalization,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1005–1017, Mar. 2006. [
12] L. Jingyi, P. Joo, and J. Ro, The Effect of Filling Unique Words to Guard Interval for OFDM, Document IEEE C802.16a-02/87, IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, Sep. 2002.
[13] M. Huemer, C. Hofbauer, and J. B. Huber, “Complex number RS Coded OFDM with systematic noise in the guard interval,” in Proc. 44th ASILOMAR Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput., Pacific Grove, CA, Nov. 2010, pp. 1023–1027
Industrial Electronics, kjsp/Mumbai, India.,922477537..(email:kumar_nitin2912@yahoo.co.in)
No. of Downloads: 7 | No. of Views: 1271
